At the beginning of September 29, 2023, lawyers for former President Donald Trump sent a harsh answer to the DC prosecutors’ request for a gag order in his case for meddling in the 2020 election. For their part, the lawyers said the request was a “desperate attempt at censorship” and a “blatant attempt to silence the former president’s political speech.”
The request for a gag order was made by Special Counsel Jack Smith. Attorney General Merrick Garland chose Smith to lead the investigation into Trump’s role in the attack on the Capitol on January 6th. Smith told the judge that Trump shouldn’t be able to talk about the case in public because it could sway the jury’s decision and stop justice from being done fairly.
Trump’s lawyers said that the request for a gag order was illegal and went against the First Amendment’s protection of free speech. They also said that the gag order wasn’t needed because there was no proof that Trump had ever tried to sway witnesses or get in the way of the probe.
READ MORE: “Trump Drops a Truth Bomb About Biden” in Speech to Auto Workers on Strike
The Cases of Trump Lawyers
In their answer, Trump’s lawyers made a number of important points against the request for a gag order. First, they said the gag order was against the Constitution because it went against Trump’s rights under the First Amendment. All kinds of speech are protected by the First Amendment, even political speech. Gag orders can only be used in very specific situations, like when they are needed to keep private information from getting out or to make sure that justice is done fairly.
Trump’s lawyers said that the request for a gag order did not meet either of these conditions. They said that Trump had not been charged with any crime and that there was no proof that he had ever tried to sway witnesses or get in the way of the probe. They also said that Trump would not be able to protect himself or his image in public because of the gag order.
Second, Trump’s lawyers said the gag order wasn’t needed. They said there are other, less strict ways to protect the fair administration of justice, like telling witnesses not to talk to the media and keeping the public out of some pre-trial hearings. They also said that the gag order would make people less likely to talk about the 2020 election and the attack on the Capitol on January 6.
READ MORE: Trump Suggests No Current GOP Contender Could Be His 2024 Running Mate
The Prosecutors’ Cases
Prosecutors asked for a gag order because they said Trump’s public comments about the case could sway the jury and make it harder for justice to be done fairly. They pointed to several public comments Trump had made about the case, such as his claims that the election was “rigged” and the attack on January 6th was a “peaceful protest.”
Prosecutors said that these comments could sway the jury’s decision, making it more possible that Trump would be found guilty. In addition, they said the comments could hurt the fair administration of justice by scaring witnesses and making it harder to find fair juries.
The Judge’s Decision
Tanya Chutkan is the judge in the case, and she hasn’t decided yet on the government’s request for a gag order. On October 10, 2023, there will be a meeting about the case.
In the Trump election conspiracy case, the request for a gag order brings up important questions about the First Amendment and how justice should be done fairly. On the one hand, the government has a right to protect the fair running of the court system. But Trump has the right to free speech under the First Amendment, which means he can protect himself in public.
When choosing whether to give the government’s request for a gag order or not, the judge will have to weigh these different points of view.