At Fast:Trump News Join

Donald Trump Issued ‘Gag Order’ Over Criminal Trial at Manhattan D.A.’s Request

Donald Trump Issued ‘Gag Order’ Over Criminal Trial at Manhattan D.A.’s Request

The 45th president is prohibited from publishing part of the case’s evidence on social media, according to a gag order imposed on him by New York state Judge Juan Merchan on Monday evening in the criminal hush money case.

“Judge Juan Merchan largely sided with Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg by limiting what Trump can publicly disclose about new evidence from the prosecution before the case goes to trial,” NBC News reported.

The order says that “any materials and information provided by the People to the Defense in accordance with their discovery obligations … shall be used solely for the purposes of preparing a defense in this matter.”


The order adds that anyone with access to the evidence being turned over to Trump’s team by state prosecutors “shall not copy, disseminate or disclose” the material to third parties, including social media platforms, “without prior approval from the court.”

It also singles out Trump, saying he is allowed to review sensitive “Limited Dissemination Materials” from prosecutors only in the presence of his lawyers and “shall not be permitted to copy, photograph, transcribe, or otherwise independently possess the Limited Dissemination Materials.”

The judge’s order also restricts Trump from reviewing “forensic images of witness cell phones,” although his lawyers can show him “approved portions” of the images after they get permission from the judge.

Regarding accusations that he fabricated business documents in connection with the hush-money lawsuit involving adult film star Stormy Daniels, Trump entered a not-guilty plea to 34 charges.

Before the 2016 election, a Manhattan grand jury accused Trump in a case concerning his alleged involvement in payments of hush money to Daniels in an effort to silence her about an affair the two of them had in 2006.

Read More: Rumors Swirl About Trump’s Potential 2024 Running Mate

Famous lawyer Alan Dershowitz recently attacked Bragg as well, stating he thought the Manhattan DA would lose his license because of his case against Trump.

While Dershowitz does not share Trump’s political views, he told DW’s Tim Sebastian that the accusations He made against the former President are “absurd and politically motivated.” Since that judges and prosecutors in New York are chosen by election, Dershowitz contended that Trump will not receive a “fair trial in Manhattan” and that they all probably have political leanings to the Left.

Dershowitz suggested that if Bragg calls former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen as a witness during the trial, which is set to start in December, things might become challenging for him.

“I don’t think an indictment can actually come forward now after the comments made by [Robert] Costello,” the attorney said.

He said that “he has proved that the main witness is going to be a perjuring liar on the witness stand, and that puts the district attorney in a terrible position.”


“If he uses Cohen as a witness, he could actually lose his bar license. Putting a witness on the stand who you know is lying is unethical, and he has to know that Cohen will be lying. Or he tries the case without Cohen, which would be very difficult, or he does the right thing: he drops the case,” Dershowitz said.

Late last month, Dershowitz presented a similar justification.

Dershowitz asserted during a Fox News appearance that if Bragg is found guilty of disclosing information about Trump’s indictment to the media, he may spend up to five years in prison.

Grand jury testimony leaks are a Class E felony in New York, punishable by a one- to five-year prison term.

Read More: Tucker Carlson Considering Plan to Host 2024 GOP Debate Forum: Report

Dershowitz also discussed the potential consequences for the district attorney of calling Michael Cohen as a witness.

According to Dershowitz, it seems like Bragg’s position is that Trump should have told Daniels why he paid for a non-disclosure agreement, which would have undermined the deal’s intended purpose.

Spread the love

Leave a Comment